by David Fox
In a record-breaking auction that saw her painting The Eye is the First Circle sell for over $9.3 million, Lee Krasner abstract expressionist painter finally received the market recognition that eluded her for decades. Despite being one of the founding figures of the Abstract Expressionist movement in New York, Krasner spent much of her career overshadowed by her husband, Jackson Pollock. The truth is far more compelling than the footnote history assigned her — Krasner was a fiercely original artist whose creative evolution never stopped, whose intellectual rigor shaped the movement itself, and whose best work rivals anything produced by her more famous peers.
Born Lena Krassner in Brooklyn to Russian-Jewish immigrant parents, Krasner declared her intention to become an artist at age thirteen — a remarkably bold decision for a young woman in the early twentieth century. She pursued formal training with a relentlessness that none of her male contemporaries could match, studying under Hans Hofmann and absorbing Cubism, Mondrian's neo-plasticism, and Matisse's color theory before synthesizing them into something entirely her own.
What makes Krasner's story essential reading for anyone interested in modern art is not the tragedy of neglect — it is the sheer volume and quality of work she produced across six decades, constantly reinventing herself while her contemporaries settled into signature styles.
Contents
Krasner's artistic education was more rigorous and varied than that of nearly any other Abstract Expressionist. She enrolled at the Women's Art School of Cooper Union, then transferred to the National Academy of Design, and later studied at the City College of New York. Each institution added a layer to her technical foundation. By the time she encountered modernism through the WPA Federal Art Project in the mid-1930s, she possessed draftsmanship skills that most of her avant-garde peers lacked.
Her engagement with Piet Mondrian's geometric abstraction proved particularly formative. While other American artists treated European modernism as something to rebel against, Krasner absorbed its structural logic and used it as scaffolding for her own experiments.
Hans Hofmann's school became a crucible for Krasner's transition from academic realism to abstraction. Hofmann's famous "push-pull" theory of pictorial space — the idea that color and form create spatial tension on a flat surface — gave Krasner a theoretical framework she would carry throughout her career. Hofmann reportedly told her that her work was "so good you would not know it was done by a woman," a backhanded compliment that perfectly encapsulated the sexism embedded in the art world she navigated.
The Hofmann period also connected Krasner to a network of artists who would become the core of the New York School. She exhibited with the American Abstract Artists group and became one of the few painters to bridge the European émigré community and the emerging American avant-garde.
The "Little Image" paintings, created in the late 1940s, represent Lee Krasner abstract expressionist painter at her most concentrated and inventive. These densely worked canvases — typically modest in size — feature allover compositions of hieroglyphic marks, drips, and thick impasto that predate or run parallel to Pollock's own allover technique. Art historians continue to debate who influenced whom, but the evidence suggests Krasner arrived at allover composition independently.
These works fall into three subcategories: the grid-based paintings with mosaic-like tessellation, the gestural web paintings with rhythmic calligraphic marks, and the hieroglyphic works dense with cryptic symbols drawn from her study of ancient writing systems.
After Pollock's death, Krasner moved into the barn studio he had used and began working at a dramatically larger scale. Paintings like The Seasons, The Gate, and Celebration explode with biomorphic energy — massive sweeping curves in bold pinks, greens, and earth tones. These works demolished any notion that Krasner was a minor figure. The scale alone demanded attention, but it was the raw emotional power and compositional mastery that silenced critics.
Krasner's early figurative work reveals a technically accomplished painter who could render the human form with precision. Her self-portraits from the National Academy period show confident handling of light and anatomy. This academic foundation matters because it proves her later abstraction was a deliberate choice, not a limitation. Much like Grace Hartigan, Krasner moved through figuration toward abstraction with full command of both modes.
The Umber paintings of the late 1950s and early 1960s mark one of Krasner's most emotionally intense periods. Rendered almost entirely in raw umber, burnt sienna, and cream on unprimed canvas, these nocturnal works were created during a period of insomnia following Pollock's death. The restricted palette forced a focus on gesture, rhythm, and compositional structure that reveals Krasner's draftsmanship at its most exposed.
One of Krasner's most distinctive practices was her habit of destroying and recycling her own paintings. She would cut up earlier canvases — and sometimes Pollock's discarded works — and reassemble the fragments into collages of extraordinary complexity. This was not waste management. It was a philosophical statement about the cyclical nature of creation, and it produced some of her most visually striking pieces.
The collage works demanded a different kind of compositional intelligence. Rather than building an image from a blank surface, Krasner negotiated with existing colors, textures, and forms, finding new harmonies in fragments of old ideas. Similar acts of radical reinvention characterize other boundary-pushing artists like Robert Rauschenberg, though Krasner's approach remained rooted in painterly abstraction rather than assemblage.
| Period | Palette | Typical Scale | Key Works |
|---|---|---|---|
| Little Image (late 1940s) | Dense, layered earth tones and primary colors | Small (under 48") | Untitled (Little Image), Noon |
| Collage (early 1950s) | Mixed — fragments from prior works | Medium to large | City Verticals, Bald Eagle |
| Umber (late 1950s) | Raw umber, burnt sienna, cream | Large | The Gate, The Eye is the First Circle |
| Color Burst (1960s) | Vivid pinks, greens, oranges | Monumental | Combat, Celebration |
| Late Works (1970s–80s) | Return to primary colors, crisp edges | Large | Palingenesis, Between Two Appearances |
The most persistent error in art history is reducing Krasner to "Mrs. Jackson Pollock." While she did manage Pollock's career and sacrificed studio time to support his work, this narrative erases her own artistic ambition and output. Krasner was an established member of the New York avant-garde before she met Pollock. She introduced him to influential critics and gallery owners, not the other way around. The Museum of Modern Art's collection pages document her independent exhibition history stretching back to the early 1940s.
Critics occasionally claimed Krasner's work was derivative of Pollock's, Hofmann's, or Mondrian's. This charge collapses under scrutiny. The Little Image paintings bear no resemblance to Pollock's drip technique — they are tight, controlled, and hieroglyphic where his work is loose and gestural. Her later biomorphic paintings share nothing with Hofmann's color blocks. Each phase of Krasner's career represents a genuine stylistic rupture, a willingness to abandon what worked and start over. Few artists in the Abstract Expressionist circle showed that kind of courage.
Serious study of Lee Krasner abstract expressionist painter begins with seeing the work in person. The Metropolitan Museum of Art, the Museum of Modern Art, and the Whitney Museum of American Art all hold significant Krasner paintings. The Pollock-Krasner House and Study Center in Springs, New York, preserves the studio where she created many of her most important works. Visiting this space provides essential context — the light, the scale of the barn, and the proximity to the natural landscape that informed her biomorphic imagery.
Internationally, the Tate Modern in London and the Centre Pompidou in Paris have acquired major Krasner paintings, reflecting the growing European recognition of her significance within the broader story of Abstract Expressionism that includes figures like Joan Mitchell.
Gail Levin's biography remains the definitive scholarly account. Robert Hobbs's catalog for the traveling retrospective provides the most thorough visual survey. For those new to Krasner's work, Eleanor Munro's chapter in Originals: American Women Artists offers an accessible entry point that places her within the broader context of women working in the postwar period.
The market for Krasner's work has surged dramatically in recent decades. Her paintings now regularly achieve seven-figure results at auction, with major works crossing into eight figures. The Pollock-Krasner Foundation serves as the official authentication body, and any serious acquisition should include provenance verification through their records. Given the increase in value, forgeries and misattributions have become a concern, particularly for works on paper from the Little Image period.
Compared to her male contemporaries — de Kooning, Rothko, Pollock — Krasner's market prices remain lower per comparable quality and historical significance. Many collectors and institutions view this gap as a correction in progress rather than a reflection of artistic merit.
Krasner's collage works present particular conservation challenges. The layered fragments of earlier paintings create complex surfaces where different paint layers age at different rates. Oil on unprimed canvas — characteristic of the Umber paintings — is especially vulnerable to environmental fluctuation. Professional conservators recommend stable humidity between 45-55% and UV-filtered lighting for display. Her mixed-media collages require specialized mounting to prevent separation of layered elements over time.
Krasner received growing recognition in her later decades, including a major retrospective at the Museum of Modern Art — though it opened just months after her death. During most of her active career, critical attention focused disproportionately on her male peers, but she exhibited consistently and maintained a strong reputation among fellow artists and informed collectors.
The Little Image paintings are a group of densely worked, small-scale abstract canvases Krasner produced in the late 1940s. They feature allover compositions of hieroglyphic marks, thick impasto, and rhythmic patterns that represent some of the earliest examples of allover painting in Abstract Expressionism.
Krasner introduced Pollock to key figures in the New York art world, including critic Clement Greenberg and gallerist Peggy Guggenheim. She also provided sustained intellectual engagement with European modernism that Pollock lacked in his own training. Their artistic dialogue was genuinely reciprocal, with evidence of mutual influence in their allover compositions.
Major holdings exist at the Metropolitan Museum of Art, the Museum of Modern Art, the Whitney Museum of American Art, and the Tate Modern. The Pollock-Krasner House in Springs, New York, is open to visitors and preserves the studio environment where many important works were created.
Krasner cut up earlier canvases and reassembled them into collages as a deliberate artistic practice, not out of frustration. This recycling represented her belief in the cyclical nature of creativity and produced some of her most visually complex and critically acclaimed works.
Krasner's defining characteristic is constant reinvention. While artists like Rothko and Newman developed signature styles and maintained them, Krasner moved through radically different phases — hieroglyphic, collage, umber, biomorphic color — each representing a genuine break from the previous. Her formal training also gave her a structural rigor that distinguished her compositions.
Krasner's market has risen substantially, with major canvases regularly achieving seven-figure auction results and top works exceeding $9 million. Works on paper and smaller pieces can still be found in the five- to six-figure range, though prices continue to climb as institutional and collector demand grows.
About David Fox
David Fox is an artist and writer whose work spans painting, photography, and art criticism. He created davidcharlesfox.com as a platform for exploring the history, theory, and practice of visual art — covering everything from Renaissance masters and modernist movements to contemporary works and the cultural context that shapes how art is made and received. At the site, he covers art history, architecture, anime art and culture, collecting guidance, and profiles of influential artists across centuries and movements.
Now get FREE Gifts. Or latest Free phones here.
Disable Ad block to reveal all the secrets. Once done, hit a button below